MCCREARY v. DOE et al
Filing
6
ORDER dismissing two claims in Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus concerning the Board's re-computation of maximum sentence and concerning first denial of parole and adopting 3 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 4/14/16. (njt)
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH MCCREARY,
Petitioner,
2:15cv1634
Electronic Mail
V.
Judge David Stewart Cercone I
Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
JOHN DOE and COMMONWEAL TH OF
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF
PROBATION & PAROLE,
Respondents.
ORDER
Kenneth McCreary, ("Petitioner"), a state prisoner, proceeding prose, has filed a Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging two denials
of parole and the re-computation of his maximum sentence expiration date.
The case was referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly in accordance with the
Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), and Local Civil Rules 72.C and D.
Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, filed on March
4, 2016, recommended that two of the claims contained in the Petition be denied pre-service
pursuant to Rule 4 because the Petition is untimely with respect to Petitioner's claim that his
sentence re-computation violated his rights and with respect to the first denial of parole. The
Report also found, in the alternative, that the sentence re-computation claim was procedurally
defaulted. Petitioner was informed that he could file Objections to the Report. Petitioner filed
Objections on April 1, 2016. ECF No. 5.
Nothing in Petitioner's Objections merits rejection of the Report or any extended
comment as the Report is clearly correct. Nothing in the Objections refutes the fact that his
sentence re-computation claim or his first denial of parole claim are time barred, or that his
sentence re-computation claim is procedurally defaulted. The Objections simply do not address
these issues and as such, are non-responsive to the Report.
In his Objections, Petitioner claims that the Board lacked authority to change his
sentence's maximum expiration date by re-computing that date. However, even if this is so, the
recalculation occurred more than one year prior to the filing of this Petition and hence, his
challenge thereto is clearly time-barred. Alternatively, even if the claim is not time-barred it is
procedurally defaulted as the Report correctly notes.
As to Petitioner's claims concerning the first denial of his parole, any and all such claims
are clearly time barred, it too is clearly time barred as the denial occurred on June 9, 2014 and
this Petition was not filed until at the earliest, December 3, 2015. In the alternative, the claim
with respect to the first denial of parole is rendered moot by the Board's denial of parole for the
second time. Alex v. Gavin, No. l:CV-14-0261, 2015 WL 8012825, at *3 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 7,
2015) ("Here, Alex's § 2254 petition was filed prior to his March 20, 2015 parole hearing.
Therefore, his challenge to the Board's denial of parole prior to its most recent decision is moot.
As noted, the only relief we can grant would be a new parole hearing and since Alex admits he
received a new hearing (albeit an unsatisfactory one) since the filing of his habeas petition, his
challenge to the denials of parole before the :rch 2015 decision is now moot.").
AND NOW, this
I"/
day of April, 2016, after de novo review of the
record in this case including the Report and Petitioner's Objections;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the two claims contained in the Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus, concerning the Board's re-computation of his maximum sentence
and concerning the first denial of parole are DISMISSED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF
No. 3, of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly, dated March 4, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the
Court as supplemented by this Memorandum Order.
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc:
The Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Kenneth Mccreary
HH-0428
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370
(Via First Class Mail)
John C. Manning, Esquire
(Via CMIECF Electronic Mail)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?