SUPPLES v. DOE et al

Filing 44

MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38 ) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/19/17. Staff note: a copy of this filing was sent today, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record. (dcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALLEN JEROME SUPPLES, Plaintiff, v. LEO L. DUNN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 16-342 Judge Cathy Bissoon Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On April 28, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 38) recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) be granted, and that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Plaintiff has filed Objections. See Doc. 43. After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 19, 2017 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Allen Jerome Supples MH3514 SCI Greene 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?