SUPPLES v. DOE et al
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38 ) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/19/17. Staff note: a copy of this filing was sent today, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record. (dcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEN JEROME SUPPLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEO L. DUNN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 16-342
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for
pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B),
and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On April 28, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 38) recommending that
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) be granted, and that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed,
without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Service of the Report
and Recommendation was made, and Plaintiff has filed Objections. See Doc. 43.
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s action is
DISMISSED, without prejudice; and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 38) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 19, 2017
s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All counsel of record
cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail):
Allen Jerome Supples
MH3514
SCI Greene
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?