Filing 70

ORDER denying defendants' 55 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 65 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/26/17. (njt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADMIRAL INSURANCE GROUP doing business as ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY A. WINIKOFF, ESQUIRE and DELL, MOSER, LANE & LOUGHNEY, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:16cv391 Electronic Filing Judge David Stewart Cercone Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly Re: ECF No. 55 Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, after Plaintiff Admiral Insurance Group d/b/a Admiral Insurance Company, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss was filed by Defendants Stanley A. Winikoff, Esquire and Dell, Moser, Lane & Loughney, LLC, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until September 11, 2017, to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the Objections filed by Defendants and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Objections, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 55 is DENIED. s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE David Stewart Cercone United States District Judge cc: Honorable Maureen P. Kelly Chief United States Magistrate Judge Dale K. Forsythe, Esquire Richard S. Canciello, Esquire James R. Schadel, Esquire Kenneth N. Schott, III, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?