ADMIRAL INSURANCE GROUP v. WINIKOFF et al
Filing
70
ORDER denying defendants' 55 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 65 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/26/17. (njt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ADMIRAL INSURANCE GROUP doing
business as ADMIRAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STANLEY A. WINIKOFF, ESQUIRE and
DELL, MOSER, LANE & LOUGHNEY,
LLC,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:16cv391
Electronic Filing
Judge David Stewart Cercone
Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
Re: ECF No. 55
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, after Plaintiff Admiral Insurance Group
d/b/a Admiral Insurance Company, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a
Motion to Dismiss was filed by Defendants Stanley A. Winikoff, Esquire and Dell, Moser, Lane
& Loughney, LLC, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the Chief United States
Magistrate Judge giving the parties until September 11, 2017, to file written objections thereto,
and upon consideration of the Objections filed by Defendants and Plaintiff’s Response in
Opposition to Defendants’ Objections, and upon independent review of the record, and upon
consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as
the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 55 is
DENIED.
s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc:
Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Dale K. Forsythe, Esquire
Richard S. Canciello, Esquire
James R. Schadel, Esquire
Kenneth N. Schott, III, Esquire
(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?