MORRIS v. USA
Filing
1
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by GREGORY LYNN MORRIS. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 5/19/2016. (lmt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
03cr218
v.
16cv507
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
GREGORY LYNN MORRIS,
Petitioner.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Currently before the Court is pro se Petitioner Gregory Morris’ Motion to Vacate
Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. no. 140 at docket no. 03cr218). In his Petition, Morris
contends that the eight (8) years of supervised release currently being imposed upon him upon
his release from prison is too lengthy a sentence and violates the statutory maximum period of
supervised release that may be imposed. The Government filed a Response to this Petition.
(Doc. no. 145 at docket no.03cr145). After reviewing the Petition and the Response, the Court
will grant in part and deny in part the Petition.
I.
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
Morris was tried by a jury and found guilty of two counts of possession with intent to
distribute cocaine and crack on November 16, 2004. On February 25, 2005, this Court held a
sentencing hearing.
On March 4, 2005, the Court entered a Judgment sentencing Morris to 240 months at
counts 1 and 2 to be served concurrently, followed by ten years of supervised release at each
count, also to be served concurrently. On May 5, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Third Circuit affirmed the Judgment of this Court.
On January 18, 2007, Morris filed a 2255 Motion (docket no. 07cv076) before this Court.
After carefully considering all arguments raised by Morris, on May 14, 2008, the Court denied
Morris’ 2255 Motion.
On July 23, 2009, this Court, upon a Motion by the Government, entered an amended
Judgment reducing Morris’ term of imprisonment to 84 months each, at counts 1 and 2, to be
served concurrently, followed by five years of supervised release at each count, also to be served
concurrently.
On March 18, 2011, a Supervised Release Petition was filed by Morris’ Probation
Officer. On April 19, 2012, this Court held a Supervised Release hearing and sentenced
Defendant to time served followed by 3 years of supervised release.
In February 12, 2012, this Court received notice that Morris was being charged with a
new federal crime, specifically, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute one hundred grams
or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of heroin. This matter was
adjudicated before United States District Judge Cathy Bissoon. See criminal case at docket no.
14cr022. Morris pled guilty to this new conspiracy charge on February 21, 2014.
On November 6, 2015, Judge Bissoon sentenced Morris to 60 months imprisonment,
followed by five years of supervised release for this offense. On the same date, November 6,
2015, the Probation Office filed a Petition for Show Cause Hearing (doc. no. 128 at docket no.
03cr218), noting that Judge Bissoon had sentenced Defendant as detailed above.
On December 1, 2015, this Court held a hearing on the Supervised Release Violation
Petition, and found that the new conspiracy charge to which Morris had pled guilty constituted a
violation of his supervised release. Accordingly, on December 3, 2015, this Court entered
Judgment against Morris, sentencing him to forty (40) months confinement (twenty (20) months
2
to run concurrent with Judge Bissoon’s sentence at case no. 14cr022, and twenty (20) months to
run consecutive to that sentence), plus three years of supervised release to run consecutive to the
five years of supervised release that Judge Bissoon had imposed. See doc. no. 135 at docket no.
03cr218.
II.
DISCUSSION
On April 26, 2016, Morris filed the instant 2255 Motion to vacate the sentence this Court
entered on December 3, 2015, arguing that by running the three years of supervised release
which this Court imposed, consecutive to the five years of supervised release that Judge Bissoon
had imposed, would result in eight years of supervised release, and thereby exceed the statutory
maximum. The Government in its brief concurred with this assessment (see doc. no. 145, p. 6-7),
and thus, the Court will amend its judgment to reflect that Morris’ three years of supervised
release for his supervised release violation run concurrently with five years of supervised
released imposed by Judge Bissoon for Morris’ conspiracy offense. In United States v. Danser,
the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held, that “[l]ike our sister circuits who
have dealt with this issue, we find that section 3624(e) and the Sentencing Guidelines do not
permit sentencing courts to impose consecutive terms of supervised release.”
Given the position of the Government and the Court of Appeals, Morris will be
supervised for a total of five years (three years at docket no. 03cr218 to run concurrent with the
period of five years at docket no. 14cr022), following his release from the Bureau of Prisons for
the conspiracy charge to which he pled guilty.1
1
Although difficult to discern, the Court believes Morris also attempted to raise an ex post facto argument
in relation to this Court’s December 3, 2015 sentence, as well as an argument concerning the calculation
of his supervised release time under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and § 3583(h). These two arguments are
meritless from a substantive standpoint, and moot, because of this Court’s decision to amend its Judgment
3
III.
CONCLUSION
The Court GRANTS in part Morris’ Motion to Vacate Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(doc. no. 140 at docket no. 03cr218) so as to run Morris’ three years of supervised release
concurrently with Judge Bissoon’s sentence of five years of supervised release (see doc. no. 40
at docket no. 14cr022). The Motion to Vacate Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED in
all other respects.
SO ORDERED, this 19th day of May, 2016,
s/ Arthur J. Schwab
Arthur J. Schwab
United States District Judge
cc:
ECF registered counsel of record
Gregory Lynn Morris
USMS 04488-748
FCI Berlin
PO Box 9000
Berlin, NH 03570
to reflect that the three years of supervised release run concurrent with Judge Bissoon’s five years of
supervised release.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?