HAWKINS v. D.O.C.
Filing
9
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition upon the District Attorney of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, The Warden of SCI Fayette, and the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Service shall be by certified mail, all costs advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/8/2016. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRAVIS HAWKINS,
Petitioner,
v.
)
)
)
)
) Civil Action No. 16-885
) Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
)
SUPERINTENDENT OF
SCI FAYETTE, et al.,
P
)
)
Respondents.
)
ORDER
AND NOW, this
gth
day of August, 2016,
IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together
with a copy of the petition upon the District Attorney of Allegheny County , Pennsylvania, The
Warden of SCI Fayette, and the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Service
shall be by certified mail, all costs advanced by the United States.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, the
Respondent and the District Attorney file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In
addition, a courtesy hard copy of all documents that were electronically filed should be submitted
directly to the undersigned.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent's Answer must comply with the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the United States District Courts (Federal 2254 Rules), the
Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and the
Court's Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures.
Specifically, Rule 5 of the Federal 2254 Rules provides as follows.
Rule 5. The Answer and the Reply
(a) When Required. The respondent is not required to answer the petition unless a
judge so orders.
(b) Contents: Addressing the Allegations; Stating a Bar. The answer must
address the allegations in the petition. In addition, it must state whether any claim in
the petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, nonretroactivity, or a statute of limitations. IN ADDRESSING PROCEDURAL
DEFAULT, RESPONDENT MUST CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF
MARTINEZ V. RYAN, 2012 WL 912950 (U.S. March 20, 2012).
(c) Contents: Transcripts. The answer must also indicate what transcripts (of
pretrial, trial, sentencing, or post-conviction proceedings) are available, when they
can be furnished, and what proceedings have been recorded but not transcribed. The
respondent must attach to the answer parts of the transcript that the respondent
considers relevant. The judge may order that the respondent furnish other parts of
existing transcripts or that parts of untranscribed recordings be transcribed and
furnished. If a transcript cannot be obtained, the respondent may submit a narrative
summary of the evidence.
(d) Contents: Briefs on Appeal and Opinions. The respondent must also file with
the answer a copy of:
(1) any brief that the petitioner submitted in an appellate court contesting
the conviction or sentence, or contesting an adverse judgment or order in
a post-conviction proceeding;
(2) any brief that the prosecution submitted in an appellate court relating
to the conviction or sentence; and
(3) the opinions and dispositive orders of the appellate court relating to
the conviction or the sentence.
(e) Reply. The petitioner may submit a reply to the respondent's answer or other
pleading within a time fixed by the judge.
Federal 2254 Rule 5 (underline emphasis added).
Further, Local Rule 2254 "ACTIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254," provides as follows.
A. Scope.
1. These rules shall apply in the United States District Court, Western District of
Pennsylvania, in all proceedings initiated under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In addition to
these rules, all parties also should consult 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the applicable
provisions of the federal habeas corpus statute at 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2266, as
amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
("AEDPA"), P.L. 104-132, effective April 24, 1996.
2. These Local Rules are intended to supplement, when necessary, the
corresponding rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court that are
entitled "Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the United States
District Courts." Those rules are cited herein as "the Federal 2254 Rules," and a
specific Federal 2254 Rule is cited as "Federal 2254 Rule_." All parties should
consult the Federal 2254 Rules at the commencement of litigation to ensure
compliance with the Federal 2254 Rules, as supplemented by these Local Rules.
In filings submitted to this Court, these Local Rules shall be cited as "LCvR
2254. II
E. The Answer and the Reply.
1. The Answer.
a. When Required. Upon the directive of the Court, the respondent shall file an
Answer to the petition in a form consistent with LCvR 2254.E. l.b-f. The
Respondent may, within the time frame permitted by the Court for the filing of
the Answer, file a motion to dismiss if the respondent believes that there is a clear
procedural bar to the action, such as the failure to exhaust, statute oflimitations,
abuse of the writ, and/or successive petitions. A motion to dismiss need not be in
a form consistent with LCvR 2254.E. l.b-f. However, such a motion must be
accompanied by a certified copy of all relevant state Court records.
b. Contents. The Answer is more than just a responsive pleading that simply
admits or denies the allegations contained in the petition. In habeas petitions
challenging a state conviction/sentence, the Answer shall contain a discussion of
the relevant procedural and factual history of all state proceedings, including the
state Court trial, direct appeal, and post-conviction proceedings. In habeas
petitions challenging state parole proceedings, the Answer shall contain the
relevant procedural and factual history of the parole proceedings and any state
Court proceedings which related to the parole proceedings.
The Answer also shall address procedural issues, the merits of the petition, and
shall contain accompanying legal argument and citation to appropriate
authorities. All assertions of historical or procedural facts shall be accompanied
by citations to the state Court record and shall appear in a style comporting with
the designations employed in the index of materials prepared in accordance with
LCvR 2254.E.1.d.
c. The respondent must also provide the Court with a certified copy of all
relevant transcripts of the state trial and post-conviction proceedings; relevant
documentary evidence admitted at those proceedings; briefs submitted by either
party to any state Court relating to the matter; opinions and dispositive orders of
the state Court or agency; other relevant state Court/agency records; and a
certified copy of the docket sheets of all the state Courts/agencies involved. Care
should be taken so that all items are photocopied accurately, legibly, and in full.
d. The respondent shall also submit an index of all material described in LCvR
2254.E.1.c. The pages of the records must be sequentially numbered so that
citations to those records will identify the exact location where the information
appears.
e. If any item identified in LCvR 2254.E.1.c is not available at the time the
respondent submits an answer, the respondent shall notify the Court that the item
is unavailable. Once the item becomes available, the respondent shall provide a
supplemental lodging of the item and index within 21 days of its availability.
f. As set forth in this Court's "Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures," in
addition to the items that must be filed electronically with the Answer, a
respondent shall also submit the original state Court records, or a certified
complete copy of those records. The records shall be submitted in the traditional
manner on paper. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that the original
state Court records have been received. State Court records are not part of this
Court's permanent case file and will be returned to the appropriate state Court
upon final disposition, including appeals.
LCvR 2254.E (emphasis added).
Finally, the Court's Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures, Section 7, provides as
follows.
7. Attachments and Exhibits.
A Filing User must submit in electronic form all documents referenced as
exhibits or attachments in accordance with the court's ECF User Manual, unless
otherwise ordered by the court. A Filing User shall submit as exhibits or attachments
only those excerpts of the referenced documents that are directly germane to the
matter under consideration by the court. Excerpted material must be clearly and
prominently identified as such. Filing Users who file excerpts of documents as
exhibits or attachments under this rule do so without prejudice to their right to timely
file additional excerp.ts or the complete document. Responding parties may timely
file additional excerpts or the complete document that they believe are/is directly
germane.
In accordance with the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus, our Local Rules and our Electronic
Case Filing Policies, Respondent is required to electronically file all exhibits that are required to be
filed in its Answer. Respondents' noncompliance with the above authorities may result in sanctions.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner shall immediately advise the Court of any
change in address. Failure to do so may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute if the Court and
other parties are unable to serve pleadings, orders and other documents upon Petitioner.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen ( 14) days from this date
to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72(C)(2) of the Local Rules of the United
States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14)
days will constitute waiver of the right to appeal.
/s/ Cynthia Reed Eddy
CYNTHIA REED EDDY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?