WHITE v. KING et al
Filing
68
ORDER dismissing amended complaint for failure to prosecute and adopting 66 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mitchell as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/14/18. (njt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CARLOS WHITE,
Plaintiff,
vs
ADRIAN KING, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 16-1001
Electronic Filing
~ER OF COURT
AND NOW, this
Ii ~ay of May, 2018, after the plaintiff, Carlos White, filed
an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the
United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a
copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon
independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 66), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15) is dismissed for
plaintiffs failure to prosecute.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty
(30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P.
David Stewart Cercone
Senior United States District Judge
cc:
Carlos White
Inmate #35442068
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
2240 Hubbard Rd.
Youngstown, OH 44505
(Via First Class Mail)
Scott A. Bradley, Esquire
(Via CMIECF Electronic Mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?