BROWN v. WOLF et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice to reopening once Plaintiff pays the full amount of statutory and administrative filing fees, totaling $400.00; and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/14/2016. (kg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALTON D. BROWN, also known as
Civil Action No. 16-1081
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial
proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and
Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On August 15, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 2) recommending that
Alton Brown (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 1) be denied
pursuant to the three strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Service of the Report and
Recommendation was made on Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation on October 13, 2016.
After a de novo review of the issues raised in the objections, together with the Report and
Recommendation, the following Order is entered:
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated August 15, 2016, hereby
is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. As the Magistrate Judge correctly found,
Plaintiff’s own submissions demonstrate that he has repeatedly refused medical care offered by
the Defendants to treat his prostate cancer. (See Docs. 1-2 at p.1, 7-1 at p.3, 7-2 at p.3, 7-3, at
p.2). Thus, if anything, it is his own refusal to obtain treatment – and not any actions by the
Defendants – that has placed Plaintiff in “imminent danger.” See In re Whitfield, No. C-08-21,
2008 WL 694713, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2008) (noting that a “voluntary hunger strike does
not place [a prisoner] in imminent danger of serious physical injury”) (emphasis in original).
Because Plaintiff has had three qualifying dismissals and he has not shown that Defendants’
actions have placed him in imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Court will deny
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
(Doc. 1) is DENIED, and this action is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to reopen
it by paying the full $400.00 filing fee.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 14, 2016
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All counsel of record
cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail):
ALTON D. BROWN
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?