STOVER v. COLVIN
Filing
29
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and the case is remanded to the Social Security Commissioner for further review pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/13/2017. (smc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD WILFRED STOVER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 16-1265
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2017, after the plaintiff, Richard Wilfred
Stover, Jr., filed an action in the above-captioned case seeking review of the Social Security
Commissioner’s final determination disallowing his claim for supplemental security income
benefits, and after cross motions for summary judgment were submitted by the parties, and after a
Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties
a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no
objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and
upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28), which
is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is
granted, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is denied and the case is
remanded to the Social Security Commissioner for further review pursuant to Sentence Four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
/s/ Joy Flowers Conti
Joy Flowers Conti
United States Chief District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?