STOVER v. COLVIN

Filing 29

ORDER granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and the case is remanded to the Social Security Commissioner for further review pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/13/2017. (smc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD WILFRED STOVER, JR., Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 16-1265 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2017, after the plaintiff, Richard Wilfred Stover, Jr., filed an action in the above-captioned case seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final determination disallowing his claim for supplemental security income benefits, and after cross motions for summary judgment were submitted by the parties, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is granted, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is denied and the case is remanded to the Social Security Commissioner for further review pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). /s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti United States Chief District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?