LEPRE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Filing
20
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation. After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17 ) and the Objections (Doc. 18 ) thereto, it hereby is ORDERED that Gerald S. L epre, Jr.'s habeas petition is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/12/19. (wss)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GERALD S. LEPRE, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
}
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 16-1441
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This case had been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell
for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and
(B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On May 28, 2019, the Magistrate Judge Mitchell issued a Report (Doc. 17)
recommending that Gerald S. Lepre, Jr.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §
2254 (Doc. 1) be dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability be denied. Service of the
Report and Recommendation was made, and Petitioner filed Objections on June 3, 2019.
(See Doc. 18.)
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, it hereby is ORDERED that Gerald S.
Lepre, Jr.’s habeas petition is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the
Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 12, 2019
s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge
cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail
and Electronic Filing):
Gerald S. Lepre, Jr.
130 Clara Street
Millvale, PA 15209
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?