KORB v. GILMORE et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen (Doc. 25 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; and the Magistrate Judge's Report a nd Recommendation (Doc. 30 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court, consistent with the rulings herein. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/11/17. (dcd) Staff note: a copy of this Memorandum Order will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record on 7/12/17.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALBERT B. KORB,
GILMORE, et al.,
Civil Action No. 16-1630
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial
proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B),
and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On June 14, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 30) recommending that
that Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case (Doc. 25) be denied, or in the alternative, that Plaintiff’s
case be dismissed with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(l). Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no
objections have been filed.
After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and
Recommendation, it hereby is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED, with prejudice,
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l).1 The Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court,
consistent with the above.
In light of this ruling, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen (Doc. 25) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 11, 2017
United States District Judge
cc (via First-Class, U.S. Mail):
Albert B. Korb
Pittsburgh, PA 15233-0991
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?