RIAZZI v. WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., LPA

Filing 34

ORDER granting defendant's 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying plaintiff's 18 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; and adopting 29 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mitchell as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 6/13/17. (njt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT J. RIAZZI, Plaintiff, vs. WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., LPA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 16-1663 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2017, after the plaintiff, Robert J. Riazzi, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion for judgment on the pleadings was submitted by the defendant, Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, and after a motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint was submitted by the plaintiff, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by the defendant, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18) is DENIED. s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE David Stewart Cercone United States District Judge cc: Honorable Robert C. Mitchell, United States Magistrate Judge Mark G. Moynihan, Esquire Richard J. Perr, Esquire Monica M. Littman, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?