AKAN v. SUMMERS et al
ORDER re 32 , 38 , and 40 , that: plaintiff's motion to reopen time 32 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the motion to extend the time to file a motion for reconsideration IS DENIED, the motion to extend the time to file an appeal purs uant to FRAP 4(a)(6) IS GRANTED; and plaintiff's motion to compel specific performance 38 and plaintiff's motion to notify the court of crucial misrepresentation 40 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/30/2018. (msp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN,
ADAM SUMMERS, NEIL
REINSFELDER, STEVEN CENTRA,
RUFUS JONES, GREGORY BOSS
sued in their individual and official
Civil Action No. 17-89
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to
“reopen time to file a motion for reconsideration and appeal from judgment entered on December
5, 2017,” (ECF No. 32), and defendants’ responses thereto (ECF No. 36, 37), and in accordance
with the accompanying memorandum opinion,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 32) IS GRANTED in part
and DENIED IN PART as follows: plaintiff’s motion to extend the time for filing a motion for
reconsideration IS DENIED, and plaintiff’s motion to extend the time to file an appeal pursuant
to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) IS GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until fourteen (14) days from the
date of this order to file a notice of appeal.
FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel specific performance
(ECF No. 38) and plaintiff’s motion to notify the court of crucial misrepresentation (ECF No.
40) are denied as moot.
/s/ Joy Flowers Conti___
Joy Flowers Conti
United States District Judge
cc: AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN
P.O. Box 945
Marienville, PA 16239-0945
(via First-Class mail)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?