AKAN v. SUMMERS et al

Filing 42

ORDER re 32 , 38 , and 40 , that: plaintiff's motion to reopen time 32 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the motion to extend the time to file a motion for reconsideration IS DENIED, the motion to extend the time to file an appeal purs uant to FRAP 4(a)(6) IS GRANTED; and plaintiff's motion to compel specific performance 38 and plaintiff's motion to notify the court of crucial misrepresentation 40 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/30/2018. (msp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN, Plaintiff, v. ADAM SUMMERS, NEIL REINSFELDER, STEVEN CENTRA, RUFUS JONES, GREGORY BOSS sued in their individual and official capacities), Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 17-89 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to “reopen time to file a motion for reconsideration and appeal from judgment entered on December 5, 2017,” (ECF No. 32), and defendants’ responses thereto (ECF No. 36, 37), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 32) IS GRANTED in part and DENIED IN PART as follows: plaintiff’s motion to extend the time for filing a motion for reconsideration IS DENIED, and plaintiff’s motion to extend the time to file an appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal. 1 FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel specific performance (ECF No. 38) and plaintiff’s motion to notify the court of crucial misrepresentation (ECF No. 40) are denied as moot. /s/ Joy Flowers Conti___ Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge cc: AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN KP-8782 SCI Forest P.O. Box 945 Marienville, PA 16239-0945 (via First-Class mail) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?