Filing 16

ORDER granting defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 12 Motion to Dismiss; further ordered that remainder of action is remanded FORTHWITH to the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County, PA; further adopting 15 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mitchell as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/11/17. (njt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DELANI J. STEWART-WILSON, a minor, by her natural mother and legal guardian, D’ERICKA STEWART, Plaintiff, vs CHRISTIAN H. BUHL LEGACY TRUST, f/k/a SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:17cv113 Electronic Mail ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2017, after the plaintiff, Delani J. Stewart J. Stewart-Wilson, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss was submitted by the United States of America, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by the United States of America (ECF No. 12) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of this action be remanded forthwith to the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County, Pennsylvania. s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE David Stewart Cercone United States District Judge cc: Honorable Robert C. Mitchell, United States Magistrate Judge Victor H. Pribanic, Esquire Brett C. Shear, Esquire Terry C. Cavanaugh, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?