MAYO v. OPPMAN et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendant Cowden's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 22, 2017 (Doc. 16 ), hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/27/2017. (kg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL OPPMAN, et.al.,
Civil Action No. 17-311
Judge Cathy Bissoon
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial
proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and
Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On June 22, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 16) recommending that
Defendant Cowden’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (Doc.
5) be granted, and that Defendant Cowden be dismissed from this action. Service of the Report
and Recommendation was made on the parties. On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed objections to the
Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). On July 26, 2017, Defendant Cowden filed a Response
to Plaintiff’s objections. (Doc. 19).
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:
Defendant Cowden’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6) is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 22,
2017, hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 27, 2017
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All counsel of record
cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail):
P.O. Box 9999
LaBelle, PA 15450
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?