VAUGHN v. GILL et al
ORDER re 5 Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff shall amend his complaint as described herein and file it with the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall clearly mark his complaint "Amended Complaint". It must include all of his claims in this action and should not refer back to the original complaint. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order then the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on October 19, 2017. (kcc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, et
Civil Action No. 17 – 546
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
After reviewing Plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 5), the Court finds that it does not
comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and therefore it is necessary for Plaintiff to file
an amended complaint that is in compliance with the Rules and the following instructions.
Instructions for Filing an Amended Complaint 1
Caption and Heading
The caption should include the name of the court, the parties, their capacities (i.e.,
whether they are being sued in their individual or representative (official) capacity), and the title
of the pleading (i.e., Amended Complaint). To do this, Plaintiff must place his full name at the
top left of the amended complaint and also add the names of each defendant. Plaintiff must
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(b), all averments should be made in separately
numbered paragraphs. This is to facilitate the “clear presentation” of the matter set forth.
name as defendants only those persons who are responsible for the alleged constitutional
Jurisdiction and Venue
Because federal court is a court of limited jurisdiction, Plaintiff must inform the Court
why the case should be heard in federal court rather than state court or some other forum. If
Plaintiff’s action is generally one for a violation of civil rights, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 will normally
be the basis for the claim. In order for Plaintiff’s action to be heard in federal court under
Section 1983, he must be able to show that the defendant(s), at the time of the claims alleged in
the amended complaint, were acting under the authority or color of state law.
Plaintiff must also explain why he is suing specifically in this Court. Venue in federal
court is by district. To learn more about venue, see 28 U.S.C. § 1391. If this is the incorrect
venue, then the Court may automatically transfer this case to the correct venue.
As the person initiating the lawsuit, Plaintiff must identify himself as such. Also, for
each defendant named in the amended complaint, Plaintiff should list their current address and
description of their employment. In addition, Plaintiff should explain briefly how or in what
capacity each defendant acted under authority given to them by state or local government.
Plaintiff must show personal involvement in the alleged wrongdoing by each defendant. See
Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1207 (3d Cir. 1988) (“A defendant in a civil rights action
must have personal involvement in the alleged wrongs”). If Plaintiff is unaware of a
Defendant’s name, then he may list them as a John/Jane Doe. He should not name
Defendants by group as he does in his current Complaint. Each Defendant must be
Statement of Facts 3
This is the time to present the facts of the case: what happened, where it happened, when
it happened, how it happened and who was involved. In this section, Plaintiff should write a
summary of the facts relevant to this lawsuit. Additionally, any document referred to in this
section must be cited as an exhibit and attached at the end of the amended complaint.
In this section, Plaintiff must provide specific details of precisely how his civil rights
were allegedly violated. Plaintiff should note that, in civil rights cases, more than conclusory
and vague allegations are required to state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff
should clearly describe how each named defendant is involved in the alleged constitution
violation(s). This description should include references to relevant dates, times, and locations.
It should explain to the Court what happened by specifically describing each defendant’s
behavior or action and how that behavior or action – or lack of action – resulted in the alleged
violations. Plaintiff should not include legal argument in his amended complaint. Citations to
case law and other statutes are not appropriate in the complaint, but rather may be included in a
response to a dispositive motion or at the time of trial. However, Plaintiff should be specific
about the particulars of the event, each defendant’s misconduct, and how such misconduct
resulted in a violation or denial of the civil right at issue.
Where the amended complaint includes more than one incident, Plaintiff should clearly
distinguish between them by preparing a separate description – usually a paragraph – for each
incident. Each incident should be identified as a separate count, and each count must include
It appears that Plaintiff has organized his current complaint in one long, continuous narrative
and not by claim. Plaintiff should divide this section of his amended complaint into paragraphs
as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
appropriate facts and evidence in support of the claims made in the count. Each incident must be
clearly and specifically described; it should include the relevant time, date, and location. Each
incident description also should clearly identify the relevant defendant and what that defendant’s
role was in the incident. Additionally, the amended complaint should set forth factual allegations
that, taken together, satisfy the elements of the cause of action.
Claims/Causes of Action
After the facts have been listed, Plaintiff should list the legal claims (also called “causes
of action”). Plaintiff must state what rights under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the
United States have been violated. It is improper for Plaintiff to merely list constitutional rights
or federal rights. Plaintiff must provide a description of how the defendant(s) violated his rights.
If Plaintiff has several claims then they must be separated into different sections and titled,
“Claim I,” “Claim II,” Claim III,” and so on.
Plaintiff must state as specifically as possible the actual injury suffered from the action of
the defendants that resulted in the alleged civil rights violation. Simply stating that his civil
rights have been violated is insufficient.
Plaintiff must alert the Court to any other case in which he was a party that may be
connected with the case he is now filing. Plaintiff should inform the Court of any and all
previously filed cases that include some of the same facts and events he relies on for this case.
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
Plaintiff should be aware that under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), he must fully exhaust all
available administrative remedies before pursuing a civil rights complaint concerning prison
Request for Relief
Plaintiff must describe for the Court the relief he is seeking as a result of this lawsuit.
The relief requested must be related specifically to the injury suffered. However, Plaintiff should
be aware that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) limits a prisoner’s ability to pursue a federal civil action for
mental or emotional injuries suffered while in custody.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b) provides that a jury demand must be made if a jury
trial is sought. If this is not done, Plaintiff has within fourteen (14) days of filing the amended
complaint to make a jury trial demand, otherwise he may be considered to have given up the
right to a jury.
Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 provides that every pleading, written motion, and
other paper must be signed by an individual attorney of record or by the pro se party. Therefore,
Plaintiff must sign his amended complaint and when doing so he is making a declaration under
law to the Court that everything in the amended complaint is true. Plaintiff should realize that
the Court can order sanctions or penalties for the filing of complaints and pleadings that are
frivolous, without merit, based on false or misleading information, etc. These sanctions or
penalties can take many forms including, but not limited to, dismissing the case, assessing fines,
and limiting Plaintiff’s filing privileges in federal court.
AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2017;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall amend his complaint as described herein
and file it with the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall
clearly mark his complaint “Amended Complaint”. The amended complaint must include all of
Plaintiff’s claims in this action and should not refer back to the original complaint. If Plaintiff
fails to comply with this Order then the undersigned will recommend that this action be
dismissed for his failure to prosecute.
/s/ Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Lisa Pupo Lenihan
United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Aaron Vaughn
1000 Follies Road
Dallas, PA 18612
Counsel for Defendants
(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?