LEVYS v. CHANNEL 11 NEWS et al
ORDER dismissing case for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and adopting 7 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/28/17. (njt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LINCOLN DAVE LEVYS, JR.,
CHANNEL 11 NEWS, MATTHEW
SANTONI, and PITTSBURGH TRIBUNAL,
Civil Action No. 17-933
Judge David Stewart Cercone
Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2017, after Plaintiff Lincoln Dave Levys, Jr.
filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter, and after a Report and Recommendation was
filed by Chief United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly giving the parties until
September 8, 2017, to file written objections thereto, and no Objections having been filed, and
upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge=s Report
and Recommendation, which is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as
provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court,
at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.
s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Lincoln Dave Levys, Jr.
SCI Camp Hill
P.O. Box 200
Camp Hill, PA 17001
(Via First Class Mail)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?