ALLEGHENY ENGINEERING COMPANY v. HAVTECH LLC
Filing
20
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that 3 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly's 19 Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/14/18. (bdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY ENGINEERING COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
V.
)
)
)
)
)
HA VTECH LLC formerly known as
HA VTECH, INC. doing business as
HA VTECH INVESTMENTS LLC also
known as THERMAL TECH LLC also known
as HA VTECH PENNSYLVANIA LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 17-1200
Judge Mark R. Hornak
Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
Re: ECFNo. 3
ORDER
ll~
AND NOW, this ~day of February, 2018, after Plaintiff Allegheny Engineering
Company filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Defendant Havtech LLC,
formerly known as Havtech, Inc., doing business as Havtech Investments LLC, also known as
Thermal Tech LLC, also known as Havtech Pennsylvania LLC, filed a Motion to Dismiss
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative, Motion for a More
Definite Statement pursuant to Rule 12(e), ECF No. 3, and after a Report and Recommendation
was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 19, and after no Objections to
the Report and Recommendation were filed, and upon independent review of the record, and
upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as
the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement pursuant to Rule
12(e), ECF No. 3, is DENIED.
Mark R. Hornak
United States District Judge
cc:
The Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?