MCCLURE v. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 5

ORDER OF REMAND. The Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 4 ) clarifies that the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000. See id. at para. 1; see also Rosado v. Encompass Ins. Co., 2010 WL 2431829, *2 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2010) ("[w]here a complaint is ambiguous as to the damages asserted and the amount in controversy is not apparent, a court may consider a subsequent stipulation as clarifying rather than amending an original pleading") (citation omitted). The Stipulation hereby is ADOPTED in full, and this case is REMANDED FORTHWITH to the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County, Pennsylvania (Case No. 10997 CD 2017). Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/22/17. (dcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEBORAH MCCLURE,
Plaintiff,
v.
PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 17-1210
Judge Cathy Bissoon

ORDER OF REMAND
The Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 4) clarifies that the amount in controversy does not
exceed $75,000. See id. at ¶ 1; see also Rosado v. Encompass Ins. Co., 2010 WL 2431829, *2
(E.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2010) (“[w]here a complaint is ambiguous as to the damages asserted and the
amount in controversy is not apparent, a court may consider a subsequent stipulation as
clarifying rather than amending an original pleading”) (citation omitted). The Stipulation hereby
is ADOPTED in full, and this case is REMANDED FORTHWITH to the Court of Common
Pleas of Indiana County, Pennsylvania (Case No. 10997 CD 2017).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

September 22, 2017

cc (via ECF email notification):
All Counsel of Record

s\Cathy Bissoon
Cathy Bissoon
United States District Judge