WILSON v. OFFICE OF ATTY GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Filing 48

MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that that the Report and Recommendation 46 is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; that Plaintiff's Objections 47 are overruled as they are without merit; that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 is granted , for the reasons stated in said Opinion; that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 9 is dismissed, with prejudice; that Plaintiff's separately filed Motion to Make Sure the Judge and A/G are Clear on the Law 41 and Motion to Enforce Law for a Default Ruling 42 are denied; that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/17/18. (jg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROGER WILSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
U.S. GOV'T,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civ. A. No. 17-01467
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy

Defendant,
MEMORANDUM ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2018, after pro se Plaintiff Roger Wilson filed an
Amended Complaint on January 8, 2018 against the U.S. Gov’t seeking $100 billion in damages,
claiming that he was wrongfully incarcerated between 2007 to 2008, (Docket No. [9]),
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and supporting brief, (Docket Nos. [12], [13]), and Plaintiff
filed numerous responses to same, (Docket Nos. [15], [21], [22], [26]), and after a Report and
Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge on April 9, 2018, (Docket No.
[46]), recommending that such Motion be granted and that the Amended Complaint be
dismissed, with prejudice, and granting the parties leave to file written objections thereto within
14 days, and Plaintiff having filed objections on April 13, 2018, (Docket No. [47]), and after
conducting a de novo review upon an independent review of the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [46] is adopted
as the Opinion of this Court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objections [47] are OVERRULED
as they are without merit;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [12] is

GRANTED, for the reasons stated in said Opinion;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [9] is
DISMISSED, with prejudice;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s separately filed Motion to Make
Sure the Judge and A/G are Clear on the Law [41] and Motion to Enforce Law for a Default
Ruling [42] are DENIED;
FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case
CLOSED.

s/Nora Barry Fischer
Nora Barry Fischer
U.S. District Judge
cc/ecf: All counsel of record