HARMON v. GIBBS et al
Filing
53
ORDER that since this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no lat er than February 28, 2019. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DIS TRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on February 14, 2019. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consent Form) (kcc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SCOTT T. HARMON,
Plaintiff,
v.
DENNIS GIBBS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-01653
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2019, that since this case has been assigned to a
Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the
Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no
later than February 28, 2019. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at
www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS
FORM IS FOUND UNDER “OTHER DOCUMENTS”, CALLED “CONSENT TO TRIAL BY
MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE”. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to
a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided
for in Local Rule 72G.
s/Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Lisa Pupo Lenihan
United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Counsel of record
Scott T. Harmon
KH-5738
S.C.I. Greene
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?