PATTERSON v. BERRYHILL

Filing 43

ORDER denying 38 Motion for In Camera Review for the reasons set forth in the Order. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/8/19. (cha)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GUY PATTERSON

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

-vsANDREW M. SAUL, U.S.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant

Case No. 18-193

AMBROSE, Senior District Judge.

ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2019, the Defendant’s Motion for In Camera Inspection
of ALJ Interview Questions (ECF Docket No. 38) is hereby DENIED. The Court appreciates the
Defendant’s proprietary interests in the interview questions and the Defendant’s desire to keep
the questions confidential. Nevertheless, the questions are relevant to the case at bar and
Plaintiff is entitled to them. As such, the Court is ordering that the documents be produced
subject to a Confidentiality Order. As Plaintiff is himself an attorney, he will understand and be
bound by the terms of the Confidentiality Order.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________________
Donetta W. Ambrose,
Senior U. S. District Judge