WILSON v. HEALEY
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that the Report and Recommendation dated 4/9/18 8 recommending that Plaintiff's claim for "Slavery 18 USC 1584" against his prior counsel Michael Healey, Esquire, (who represented him in 2012 during superv ised release proceedings), seeking $100 million in damages be dismissed, as frivolous, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court; Plaintiff's objections 9 contesting the Magistrate Judge's procedures and complaining about his incarcerat ion on violation petitions and the alleged theft of his patents are overruled, as they are meritless; Plaintiff's Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal 3 is denied, as moot; Plaintiff's Complaint 6 is dismissed, with prejudice, as it is frivolous; and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/17/18. (jg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
DELTA AIRLINES, SHARE
BUILDERS.COM,
Defendant,
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
CHRIS EYSTER and PAUL BOAS,
Defendant,
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
MCKEESPORT POLICE DEPT., et al.,
Defendant,
1
Civ. A. No. 18-305
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
Civ. A. No. 18-306
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
Civ. A. No. 18-307
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
U.S. GOV’T / FEDERAL A/G and
RENEWAL CENTER,
Defendant,
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
MIKE HEALEY,
Defendant,
ROGER WILSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
Defendant,
Civ. A. No. 18-308
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
Civ. A. No. 18-311
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
Civ. A. No. 18-314
Judge Nora Barry Fischer
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy
MEMORANDUM ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2018, after pro se Plaintiff Roger Wilson was granted
leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of the above listed actions by the United States
Magistrate Judge, who then proceeded to file separate Reports and Recommendations in each of
2
the cases with the Court, recommending that each of the Complaints be dismissed, sua sponte,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), as the claims set forth in each of the actions were frivolous,
and Plaintiff having filed objections to same, and after conducting a de novo review upon an
independent review of the record in each of the cases,
The Court hereby ORDERS the following:
1. Civil Action No. 18-305 Wilson v. Delta Airlines et al. - The Report and
Recommendation filed on April 9, 2018 [11] recommending that Plaintiff’s claims for
fraud seeking $25 million in damages due to an alleged theft of stock that he
purchased in 2006 by Defendants be dismissed as frivolous is adopted as the Opinion
of the Court; Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation complaining
of the screening procedures utilized by the Magistrate Judge and claiming that he
would cite to additional statutes [12] are OVERRULED; Plaintiff’s Complaint [9] is
DISMISSED, with prejudice, as it is frivolous; Plaintiff’s Motion to Get the Marshals
to Make Service [5] is DENIED, as moot; and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark
this case CLOSED;
2. Civil Action No. 18-306 Wilson v. Eyster et al. -- The Report and Recommendation
filed on April 9, 2018 [10] recommending that Plaintiff’s claims for “Slavery 18 USC
1589” and “18 USC Theft By Deception” seeking $2 billion in damages from his
prior defense counsel in criminal numbers 06-316 and 07-101 be dismissed as
frivolous is adopted as the Opinion of the Court; Plaintiff’s objections to the Report
and Recommendation [12] stating he cited the incorrect statute and wishes to pursue
claims under 18 USC 1584 and contends that the screening procedure utilized by the
Magistrate Judge is illegal are OVERRULED, as they are without merit; Plaintiff’s
3
Complaint [8] is DISMISSED, as frivolous; Plaintiff’s Motion to Get the Marshals to
Make Service [4] is DENIED, as moot; and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this
case CLOSED;
3. Civil Action 18-307 Wilson v. McKeesport Police Dept. et al. – The Report and
Recommendation filed on April 9, 2018 [11] recommending that Plaintiff’s claims for
“Obstruction [of] Justice 18 U.S.C. 1503” seeking $25 million in damages from the
McKeesport Police Department, the City of McKeesport, the SEC, the U.S. Gov’t and
State of PA arising from his having filed police reports (in 2011 and 2017)
complaining that Delta Airlines stole around $10 million in stock be dismissed, as
frivolous, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court; Plaintiff’s objections to the Report
and Recommendation [12] once again objecting to the procedures of the Magistrate
Judge and claiming that he is attempting to pursue civil antitrust claims are
OVERRULED, as his claims are still frivolous; Plaintiff’s Motion to Get the
Marshals to Make Service [4] is DENIED, as moot; Plaintiff’s Complaint [7] is
DISMISSED, with prejudice, as it is frivolous; and the Clerk of Court is directed to
mark this case CLOSED.
4. Civil Action No. 18-308 – Wilson v. U.S. Gov’t, et al. – The Report and
Recommendation filed on April 9, 2018 [10] recommending that Plaintiff’s claims for
“Slavery 18 USC 1585” wherein he asserts that he was arrested in 2011 between May
and July and held by the U.S. Government until December 2011 without trial and
knew he was innocent be dismissed, as frivolous, is adopted as the Opinion of the
Court; Plaintiff’s objections [11] complaining about the alleged illegal procedures
utilized by the Magistrate Judge and clarifying that the Government both incarcerated
4
him without trial and stole his patents are OVERRULED, as his claims are frivolous;
Plaintiff’s Complaint [7] is DISMISSED, with prejudice, as it is frivolous; Plaintiff’s
Motion to Get the Marshals to Make Service [4] is DENIED, as moot; and the Clerk
of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
5. Civil Action No. 18-311 – Wilson v. Healey – The Report and Recommendation
dated April 9, 2018 [8] recommending that Plaintiff’s claim for “Slavery 18 USC
1584” against his prior counsel Michael Healey, Esquire, (who represented him in
2012 during supervised release proceedings), seeking $100 million in damages be
dismissed, as frivolous, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court; Plaintiff’s objections
[9] contesting the Magistrate Judge’s procedures and complaining about his
incarceration on violation petitions and the alleged theft of his patents are
OVERRULED, as they are meritless; Plaintiff’s Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal
[3] is DENIED, as moot; Plaintiff’s Complaint [6] is DISMISSED, with prejudice, as
it is frivolous; and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED;
6. Civil Action No. 18-314 – Wilson v. United States of America et al. – The Report and
Recommendation filed on April 9, 2018 [8] recommending that Plaintiff’s claims for
“Obstruction [of] Justice 18 U.S.C. 1503” and “42 U.S.C. 1981 Equal Rights Under
the Law” seeking $50,000 in damages against the Defendants based on his having
attempted to file police reports against his attorney for illegally stealing money from
him but the law enforcement agents refuse to take the reports and then later, upon
taking one of his reports, refused to arrest the attorney must be dismissed, as
frivolous; Plaintiff’s objections [9] are OVERRULED as they are without merit;
Plaintiff’s Complaint [6] is DISMISSED, with prejudice, as it is frivolous; Plaintiff’s
5
Motions [3], [4] seeking the U.S. Marshal to make service are DENIED, as moot;
and, the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Barry Fischer
Nora Barry Fischer
U.S. District Judge
cc/ecf: All counsel of record
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?