WASHINGTON v. COLGAN et al
Filing
53
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Pittsburgh and they are dismissed from this action with prejudice; adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 Report and Recommendations as the Opinion of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), Defendants Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania are sua sponte dismissed from this action with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining claim in this case is dism issed without prejudice because it is duplicative to claim one at Civil Action No. 17-988. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/4/2019. (smc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JERMONE JUNIOR WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
C.O. COLGAN, MR. GILMORE,
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, and STATE
OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 18 – 341
District Judge Joy Flowers Conti
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim that was
filed by Defendant City of Pittsburgh on February 6, 2019. (ECF No. 32.) The Motion was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan pursuant to the Magistrate Judge’s
Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.
On July 26, 2019, a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) was filed by the Magistrate
Judge recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that Defendant City of
Pittsburgh be dismissed from this action with prejudice. It further recommended that pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), the Court sua sponte dismiss with prejudice Defendants
Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania and that the remaining claim in this case be dismissed
without prejudice as duplicative to claim one in Civil Action No. 17-988. (ECF No. 52.) The
R&R was served on all parties with a written objections deadline for unregistered ECF users set
for August 12, 2019. As of today, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, after careful de
novo review of the record and consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, the following order
is now entered.
1
AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2019;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 52) is
adopted as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of
Pittsburgh (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED and they are dismissed from this action with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii),
Defendants Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania are sua sponte dismissed from this action with
prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining claim in this case is dismissed without
prejudice because it is duplicative to claim one at Civil Action No. 17-988.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules
of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by
Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
By the Court:
/s/ Joy Flowers Conti____
Joy Flowers Conti
Senior United States District Judge
Cc:
Jerome Junior Washington
HV0282
175 Progress Dr.
Waynesburg, PA 15370
Counsel of record
(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?