HENSLEY v. TREMPUS et al

Filing 30

ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for immediate release to rehab,which has been construed as a motion for injunctive relief 26 , is DENIED. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued January 17, 2019 28 , is adopted as the opinion of the court. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 2/27/19. (lrw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH HENSLEY, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH TREMPUS, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 18-355 Pittsburgh District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo MEMORANDUM ORDER This action was commenced by Plaintiffs filing of a prose civil rights complaint accompanied by a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("ifp motion") [ECF No. 1], on March 19, 2018. This matter was originally referred to the undersigned, then a United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial proceedings. On September 14, 2018, the undersigned was sworn in as a United States District Judge. This case was subsequently reassigned to the undersigned, as presiding judge, and was referred to newly appointed United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On November 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "motion for immediate release to rehab" [ECF No. 26], which is construed as a motion for injunctive relief. In this one sentence motion, Plaintiff seeks an order releasing him from prison to a rehab center "as SCl's can not properly treat him .... " (Id.). On January 17, 2019, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief [ECF No. 26] be denied because Plaintiff seeks relief that is both unrelated to any of the matters raised in the underlying complaint and not cognizable in an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [ECF No. 28]. Plaintiff has since filed timely objections to the R&R that failed to raise any grounds to overcome the deficiencies recognized by the Magistrate Judge. [ECF No. 29]. After de nova review of the motion and relevant documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2019; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs "motion for immediate release to rehab," which has been construed as a motion for injunctive relief [ECF No. 26], is DENIED. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued January 17, 2019 [ECF No. 28], is adopted as the opinion of the court. J~~'-~~ SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER United States District Judge cc: The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?