JOHNSON v. WPIC

Filing 5

ORDER re 3 Complaint filed by ASIA JOHNSON. For the reasons indicated in the foregoing opinion, the Complaint is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/10/2018. (msp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASIA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. WPIC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 18-422 ORDER AND NOW this 10th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of the complaint filed by plaintiff, Asia Johnson, pro se and in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 3), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion the complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and amendment would be futile. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. By the court, s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti Chief United States District Judge cc: Asia Johnson 1807 West St., Apt. 2 Munhall, PA 15120 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?