BORGHESE LANE, LLC

Filing 649

ORDER that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, Industry Terminal & Salvage Company's 618 MOTION to Strike McKees Rocks' Sur-Reply Brief is GRANTED. McKees Rocks' 618 Sur-Reply Brief is stricken; and ITS's [ 536] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The August 2015 Harbor Services Agreement, and subsequent oral Harbor Services Agreement, are valid maritime contracts. McKees Rocks has breached the Harbor Services Agreement as set forth in the O rder. As explained in detail in Order, Judgment and Declaratory Judgment are granted in favor of ITS on ITS's crossclaims against McKees Rocks; and Judgment granted in favor of ITS as to McKees Rocks' cross- and counterclaims seeking reformation and equitable reformation of the Harbor Services Agreement. Additional details as set forth in Order.. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 4/24/23. (rtw)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00533-MJH Document 649 Filed 04/24/23 Page 1 of 3 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT OF: BORGHESE LANE, LLC For Exoneration or Limitation of Liability ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:18-cv-00533-MJH (Lead Case) ) ) Member and Related Cases: Civil Action Nos. ) 18-510; 18-178; 18-317; 18-913; 18-902; and ) 18-1647. ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2023, upon consideration of the Motion to Strike SurReply and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Industry Terminal & Salvage Company, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as follows: 1. Industry Terminal & Salvage Company’s Motion to Strike McKees Rocks’ Sur- Reply Brief (ECF No. 618) is GRANTED. McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC’s Sur-Reply Brief, filed at ECF No. 613, is hereby stricken, 2. Industry Terminal & Salvage Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Breach of Contract and Contractual Indemnity Against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC (ECF No. 536) is GRANTED. A. The August 2015 Harbor Services Agreement and the subsequent oral Harbor Services Agreement, which arose after expiration of the written Agreement, are valid, unambiguous, and enforceable maritime contracts. Case 2:18-cv-00533-MJH Document 649 Filed 04/24/23 Page 2 of 3 B. McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC has not produced sufficient clear and convincing evidence of any legal basis for reformation or equitable reformation of the Harbor Services Agreement. C. McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC has breached the Harbor Services Agreement by failing to defend Industry Terminal & Salvage Company as required under Section 8. D. McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC has breached the Harbor Services Agreement by failing to name Industry Terminal & Salvage Company as an additional insured as required under Section 8. E. McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC must provide indemnity to Industry Terminal & Salvage Company, to the extent Industry Terminal & Salvage Company is found liable for damages caused by the Mooring Services and/or mooring area condition at the Jack’s Run fleeting and mooring area on January 13, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Industry Terminal & Salvage Company and against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC, on Industry Terminal & Salvage Company’s crossclaim 1 against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC. JUDGMENT is entered against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC for costs, defense costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred as a result of McKees Rocks’ breach of its obligation to defend and for all expenses incurred and discharged and all expenses incurred in discharging the claims asserted against ITS in the current litigation. 1 Industry Terminal & Salvage Company filed the identical crossclaim, as to the Harbor Services Agreement, against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC in multiple pleadings. See, for example, ITS’s crossclaim was filed at Civil Action No. 18-178 at document number 25; at Civil Action 18-317 at document number 14; at Civil Action No. 18-510 at document number 17; and at Civil Action No. 18-533 at document numbers 228 and 229. 2 Case 2:18-cv-00533-MJH Document 649 Filed 04/24/23 Page 3 of 3 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Industry Terminal & Salvage Company and against McKees Rocks Harbor Service, LLC on Industry Terminal & Salvage Company’s crossclaim. 2 Pursuant to Section 8 of the Harbor Services Agreement, McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC must provide indemnity to Industry Terminal & Salvage Company, to the extent Industry Terminal & Salvage Company is found liable for damages caused by the Mooring Services and/or mooring area condition at the Jack’s Run fleeting and mooring area on January 13, 2018. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Industry Terminal & Salvage Company and against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC, as to McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC’s crossclaim and counterclaim 3 seeking reformation and equitable reformation of the Harbor Services Agreement. ___________________________ ____________________________ Marilyn JJ. H Horan oran n United States District Court Judge 2 Industry Terminal & Salvage Company filed the identical crossclaim, as to the Harbor Services Agreement, against McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC in multiple pleadings. See, for example, ITS’s crossclaim was filed at Civil Action No. 18-178 at document number 25; at Civil Action 18-317 at document number 14; at Civil Action No. 18-510 at document number 17; and at Civil Action No. 18-533 at document numbers 228 and 229. 3 McKees Rocks Harbor Services, LLC’s filed the same or similar crossclaim and counterclaim seeking reformation and equitable reformation of the Harbor Services Agreement in multiple pleadings. See, for example, counterclaims filed at Civil Action No. 18-178 at document number 29 and Civil Action No. 533 at document number 15; and crossclaims filed at Civil Action 18-178 at document number 27 & 28; at Civil Action 18-533 at document numbers 15 & 60. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?