STEWART v. GEICO INSURANCE et al
OPINION granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the claim for Bad Faith asserted by Dr. Stewart, in each instance and in the totality of circumstances, fails to produce sufficient evidence for any jury to conclude bad faith by clear and convincing evidence. As such, GEICOs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted. Dr. Stewarts claim for Bad Faith in Count II of his complaint is dismissed. A separate order will follow. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 2/19/2020. (bjl)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?