SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST v. FRANCESO FLORENTINO CONCORDIA
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 14 Request for Default Judgment filed by SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST. In light of the fact that Defendant has been served with the 1 Complaint and Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, and has no t appeared to contest the Court's potential appointment of Mr. Cinciripini as an umpire pursuant to the terms of the Policy, the Court will make the appointment as more fully set forth in the attached opinion. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 6/3/2021. (jmm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
FRANCESO FLORENTINO CONCORDIA,
Plaintiff, an insurance provider, filed this lawsuit on January 7, 2021 in connection with an
insurance claim Defendant submitted to Plaintiff as a result of a fire to Defendant’s property. See
generally, ECF No. 1. The basis of the Court’s jurisdiction is diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332. See ECF No. 18. Per the Complaint, Plaintiff issued an insurance policy (the “Policy”) to
Defendant which provided that, in the event of a dispute over the value of a coverable loss, each
party will select an impartial appraiser and the parties’ selected appraisers will select an umpire
together. See ECF No. 1 at ¶ 9. According to the Policy, if the appraisers cannot agree, either may
request that the selection be made by a judge of a court having jurisdiction.” Id. The Complaint
alleges that the parties’ appraisers cannot agree on an umpire and asks the Court to appoint an
umpire. See generally, ECF No. 1 at ¶ 12; ECF No. 14.
Plaintiff served Defendant on February 23, 2021. ECF No. 10-4. Defendant failed to
appear and on April 21, 2021, the clerk entered default against Defendant. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff
moved for default judgment on May 5, 2021 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. ECF
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), the Court may enter default judgment
against a party who fails to appear. The relief Plaintiff requests in its Motion for Default Judgment
is the same as is requested in the Complaint: for the Court to appoint an umpire to adjudicate
under the terms of the Policy. Courts in this Circuit have given effect to contractual provisions
permitting the court to appoint an umpire. See Emplr. Trs. of W. Pa. Teamsters v. Union Tr. of W.
Pa. Teamsters, 870 F.3d 235 (3d Cir. 2017) (remanding the case for the district court to appoint
an umpire with respect to a dispute under a labor contract pursuant to the terms of the contract).
The Court will do the same here.
Plaintiff asks that the Court appoint Dave Cinciripini as umpire. ECF No. 1 at ¶ 20. Mr.
Cinciripini works as a Senior Estimator at BELFOR Property Restoration and has worked in that
role for over 19 years. ECF No. 1 at ¶ 20. Given that Defendant has been served with the
Complaint and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, and has not appeared to contest the
Court’s potential appointment of Mr. Cinciripini as an umpire pursuant to the terms of the Policy,
the Court will make the appointment.
DATED this 3rd day of June, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Christy Criswell Wiegand
CHRISTY CRISWELL WIEGAND
United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification):
All Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?