ROSARIO v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA et al

Filing 16

ORDER indicating that the Court accepts and adopts Judge Kelly's Report and Recommendation 15 in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. All of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Westmoreland County Prison are stricken, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14 ). Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 9/8/21. (jg)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00208-RJC-MPK Document 16 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH ROSARIO, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA; WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMISSIONER; WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON; WARDEN WALTON; DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER; DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARZ; LIEUTENANT TOMASELLO; LIEUTENANT WOLFF; SERGEANT GILLETTE; SERGEANT BRADLEY; and JOHN DOE 1-6, Defendants. 2:21-cv-208 District Judge Robert J. Colville Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly Re: ECF No. 14 ORDER OF COURT Before the Court is the Honorable Maureen P. Kelly’s August 11, 2021 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15), which recommends that all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Westmoreland County Prison be stricken sua sponte pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14). Objections to Judge Kelly’s Report and Recommendation were due by August 30, 2021. No objections were filed, and the matter is now ripe for disposition. With respect to dispositive matters, the reviewing district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). “The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The United States 1 Case 2:21-cv-00208-RJC-MPK Document 16 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2 Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has explained that, “even absent objections to the report and recommendation, a district court should ‘afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report,’” and has “described this level of review as ‘reasoned consideration.’” Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987)). Upon consideration of Judge Kelly’s August 11, 2021 Report and Recommendation and upon review of the record in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: The Court accepts and adopts Judge Kelly’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. All of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Westmoreland County Prison are stricken, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14). BY THE COURT: s/Robert J. Colville____ Robert J. Colville United States District Judge DATED: September 8, 2021 cc: Honorable Judge Maureen P. Kelly United States Magistrate Judge Keith Rosario MB-4878 SCI Albion 10745 Route 18 Albion, PA 16475 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?