Filing 11

ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/19/23. (dcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY SADOWSKI, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 22-1129 Judge Cathy Bissoon ORDER Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) will be granted. Plaintiff filed this action in a magisterial district in state court. The sum total of Plaintiff’s allegations are that he suffered “[d]iscrimination of delivery of mail.” Compl. (Doc. 1-1). No factual basis for this assertion is supplied. See id. The United States removed the case to this federal Court, and has filed a Motion to Dismiss. Among other things, the government asserts that Plaintiff’s action is barred by sovereign immunity, he has failed to exhaust administrative remedies and his claim fails under the notice pleading standards. See Def.’s Br. (Doc. 8). The Court entered a response Order, see Doc. 9, Plaintiff’s deadline has long expired and no response has been filed. For the reasons stated in Defendant’s briefing, dismissal is warranted based on sovereign immunity, Plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate the exhaustion of administrative remedies and under the notice pleading standards and Iqbal/Twombly. In light of Plaintiff’s failure to respond, the Court has no reason to believe that his pleadings can or will be cured by amendment. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 19, 2023 s/Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Stanley Sadowski, Jr. 64 Third St. Lawrence, PA 15055 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?