CARTER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 51

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the 50 Report and Recommendation filed on 1/16/25, as the opinion of the Court, and dismissing action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 3/5/25. (rtw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY CARTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ) COMMONWEALTH OF PA, FAYETTE ) COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY ) EXECUTIVE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ) RICH BOWERS, WARDEN JOHN ) LENVEY, STATE TROOPER JOHN ) DOE’s #1-#7, JANE DOE, and ) UNIONTOWN HOSPITAL WVU ) MEDICINE, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 23-1754 MEMORANDUM ORDER The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Civil Rules 72.C and D. Magistrate Judge Kelly issued a Report and Recommendation filed January 16, 2025, recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 50. Plaintiff Anthony Carter was informed that in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2, that objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by February 3, 2025. No Objections have been filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 5th day of March 2025, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 50, filed on January 16, 2025, by Magistrate Judge Kelly, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall mark this case closed. _s/Marilyn J. Horan Marilyn J. Horan United States District Court Judge ANTHONY CARTER, pro se No. 18412023 Westmoreland County Prison 3000 South Grande Blvd. Greensburg, PA 15601 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?