JERRY v. BEARD et al

Filing 105

MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration; 102 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 10/16/2012. (dlg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BERNARD JERRY,
Plaintiff

v.

Case No. 3:08-cv-125-KRG-KAP

JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants
MEMORANDUM ORDER
The plaintiff's post-judgment motions filed at docket no.
95 and docket no.

96 were referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A.

Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (3).
The Magistrate Judge filed an Order and a Report and
Recommendation

on

September

18,

2012,

docket

no.

102,

denying

docket no. 96 and recommending that docket no. 95 be denied.
The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636 (b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the
Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal,

docket no. 103.
After

de

novo

review

of

the

record,

the

Report

and

Recommendation, and the pleadings subsequent thereto, the following
order is entered:

AND NOW, this
ORDERED

that

docket no. 95, is denied.

\G-fhday of October,
plaintiff's

motion

2012, i t is

for

reconsideration,

The Report and Recommendation is adopted

as the opinion of the Court.

B~~
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:
Bernard Jerry AP-3307
S.C. I. Cresson
P.O. Box A
Cresson, PA 16699-0001

2