PEARSON v. SECRETARY BEARD et al
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 55 Motion to Reconsider or to Vacate the Judgment; 57 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/28/2013. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTONIO PEARSON,
Plaintiff
v.
SECRETARY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants
:Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP
MEMORANDUM ORDER
The motion
filed
at
docket
no.
55,
was
referred to
Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates
Act,
28 U.S.C.§ 636(b),
and Local Civil Rule 72 for Magistrate
Judges.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
on
February 11,
2013,
docket
no.
57,
considering the untimely
objections at docket no. 56 to be incorporated into the motion and
recommending that the motion be denied.
The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636 (b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the
Report and Recommendation.
No objections have been filed and the
time to do so has expired.
After
Recommendation,
review
of
and noting
following order is entered:
the
the
record
lack of
and
the
Report
and
timely objections,
the
AND NOW, this
?8 -+h
day
of February, 2013, it is
ORDERED that the motion to reconsider or to vacate the
judgment, docket no. 55, is denied.
The Report and Recommendation
is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
BY THE COURT:
~~
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:
Antonio Pearson BL-0521
S.C.I. Coal Township
1 Kelley Drive
Coal Township, PA 17866-1021
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?