PEARSON v. SECRETARY BEARD et al

Filing 61

MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 55 Motion to Reconsider or to Vacate the Judgment; 57 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/28/2013. (dlg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTONIO PEARSON, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY BEARD, et al., Defendants :Case No. 3:09-cv-54-KRG-KAP MEMORANDUM ORDER The motion filed at docket no. 55, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b), and Local Civil Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on February 11, 2013, docket no. 57, considering the untimely objections at docket no. 56 to be incorporated into the motion and recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636 (b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After Recommendation, review of and noting following order is entered: the the record lack of and the Report and timely objections, the AND NOW, this ?8 -+h day of February, 2013, it is ORDERED that the motion to reconsider or to vacate the judgment, docket no. 55, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. BY THE COURT: ~~ KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to: Antonio Pearson BL-0521 S.C.I. Coal Township 1 Kelley Drive Coal Township, PA 17866-1021 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?