CAMESI et al v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al

Filing 549

ORDER. This Court's Order (Doc. 521 ) denying Plaintiffs' Motion to vacate or reduce the amount of costs awarded is REINSTATED. The Court will issue, contemporaneously herewith, a Rule 58 judgment as relates to the Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/18/17. (dcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREN CAMESI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09-85J Judge Cathy Bissoon ORDER The Court − as factfinder – has determined that the only competent evidence of record establishes that “Process[ing] to Ontrack Inview” was the means by which native files were converted to TIFF format; and, consequently, the costs associated with it are recoverable under Race Tires. See Nov. 15th Order (Doc. 545) at 1-2. On this basis, alone and independently, the award of $310,000 in the Bill of Costs is sustainable. Recognizing that this determination likely would be appealed, the Court permitted Defendants to supplement the record at the trial-court level, so that any remaining information regarding the salient issues would be available to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The sworn statement by Defendants’ witness confirms, and bolsters, this Court’s interpretation of the Hearing-testimony,1 which – as noted above – was the only competent evidence of record. Plaintiffs’ process-related objections to supplementation notwithstanding, there now remains no doubt as to recoverability, either in the legal-sense or as a matter of objective reality. See Doc. 546-1 at ¶ 3 (“[t]here was no incremental or separate charge for loading the TIFFs to the Inview platform[,] . . . it was a single procedure . . . [with] a single charge”). 1 Accordingly, this Court’s Order (Doc. 521) denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to vacate or reduce the amount of costs awarded is REINSTATED. The Court will issue, contemporaneously herewith, a Rule 58 judgment as relates to the Bill of Costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 18, 2017 s\Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?