HASAN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that the motion to certify a class at docket no. 62 is denied without prejudice, and the motion to alter the judgment at docket no. 63 is denied; 65 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 12/8/2015. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF THE CITY
OF DUQUESNE (LARRY HASAN),
Plaintiff,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 3:14-cv-250-KRG-KAP
Memorandum Order
Plaintiff's motion to certify a class at docket no.
62
and motion to alter the judgment at docket no. 63 were referred to
Magistrate Judge Keith A.
Pesto under 28 U.S.C.§
636(b) (3)
and
Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
on November 5, 2015, docket no.
65, recommending that the motion
to certify a class be denied without prejudice and the motion to
alter the judgment be denied.
The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636 (b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the
Report and Recommendation.
No one has filed objections, and the
time to do so has expired.
After review of the Report and Recommendation and noting
the lack of objection thereto, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this
g-fh day of
December, 2015, it is
ORDERED that the motion to certify a class at docket no.
62
is
denied
without
prejudice,
judgment at docket no. 63 is denied.
and
the
motion
to
alter
The Report and Recommendation
is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
BY THE COURT:
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:
Larry A. Hasan
209 Library Court
Duquesne, PA 15110
2
the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?