COSTON v. KIRBY et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that to the extent that what was docketed at ECF no. 14 can be considered a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), it is denied, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/27/2018. (dlg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RASHOD D. COSTON, Plaintiff v. Case No. 3:15-cv-13-KRG-KAP MARK KIRBY, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO, Defendant Memorandum Order This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636, and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on May 24, 2017, ECF no. 16, recommending that the plaintiff's correspondence at ECF no. 14 that was construed as a second motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) be denied. The plaintiff was given notice at his last given address that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After review of the record of this matter, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the lack of objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 27+hday of March 2018, it is ORDERED that to the extent that what was docketed at ECF no. 14 can be considered a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), it is denied. KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice by U.S. Mail to: Rashad D. Coston 1017 N. Townsend Street Syracuse, NY 13208 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?