COSTON v. KIRBY et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that to the extent that what was docketed at ECF no. 14 can be considered a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), it is denied, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/27/2018. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RASHOD D. COSTON,
Plaintiff
v.
Case No. 3:15-cv-13-KRG-KAP
MARK KIRBY, WARDEN, F.C.I.
LORETTO,
Defendant
Memorandum Order
This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A.
Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28
U.S.C.§ 636, and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
on May 24,
2017,
ECF no.
16,
recommending that the plaintiff's
correspondence at ECF no. 14 that was construed as a second motion
under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) be denied. The plaintiff was given notice
at his last given address that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1),
he had fourteen days to file written objections to this Report and
Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do
so has expired.
After
review
of
the
record
of
this
matter,
the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the lack of objections
thereto, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this
27+hday
of March 2018, it is
ORDERED that to the extent that what was docketed at ECF
no. 14 can be considered a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), it is
denied.
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by U.S. Mail to:
Rashad D. Coston
1017 N. Townsend Street
Syracuse, NY 13208
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?