RICHARDSON v. ROZUM et al
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; 44 Report and Recommendation dated 6/9/2017 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/6/2017. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTWAN RICHARDSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
V.
GERALD ROZUM, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.: 3: 15-cv-0087
United States District Judge
Kim R. Gibson
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This prisoner civil rights case was commenced on April 2, 2015, with the filing of a
petition to proceed informa pauperis and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia
Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง
636(b )( 1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, dated June 9, 2017 (ECF No. 44)
recommended that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in its entirety. A copy
of the report and recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail at his
listed address. Plaintiff was advised that he had until June 26, 2017, to file written objections to
the Report and Recommendation. 1 Plaintiff has not filed any objections nor has he sought an
extension of time in which to do so.
At the time Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit he was an inmate in the custody of the
Pennsylvania of Corrections confined at SCI-Camp Hill. On August 9, 2016, Plaintiff provided
the Court with a change of address. (ECF No. 33.)
1
After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the
Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion for summary judgment will be granted. An
appropriate order will be entered.
Dated: July
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?