HOOK et al v. WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURING CORP. et al
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 72 Motion in Limine; granting 75 Motion in Limine; denying 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. Mo bile Trailer Maintenance LLC's Motion is GRANTED with respect to Whiting Door Manufacturing Corp.'s claims against it and DENIED with respect to C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.'s claims against it. Accordingly, Counts I, II, and IV of Mr. Hook's Complaint fail as a matter of law, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/14/2019. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS W. HOOK and PATTI HOOK,
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-281
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
~
JUDGE KIM R. GIBSON
)
)
WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURING
CORP. and C & S WHOLESALE
GROCERS, INC.,
)
)
)
)
Defendants,
)
)
~
)
)
MOBILE TRAILER MAINTENANCE, LLC, )
)
Third-Party Defendant.
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I.
Introduction
Before the Court are three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff Whiting Door Manufacturing Corp. (ECF No 69), DefendantCrossclaimant C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (ECF No. 78), and Third-Party Defendant
and Crossclaim-Defendant Mobile Trailer Maintenance, LLC (ECF No. 80). These motions
are fully briefed (see ECF Nos. 70, 79, 81, 90, 91, 92) and are ripe for disposition.
Also before the Court are two Motions in Limine filed by Defendants Whiting Door
Manufacturing Corp., C & S Wholesale Grocers, and Mobile Trailer Maintenance, LLC.
(See ECF Nos. 72, 75, 77, 84, 85.) These motions are fully briefed (see ECF Nos. 73, 76, 87,
94) and are ripe for disposition.
This is a personal-injury lawsuit arising from injuries that Plaintiff Thomas W.
Hook sustained while employed as a truck driver. (ECF No. 82
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?