BURKS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that the plaintiff's motions at ECF no. 26 , ECF no. 28 , and ECF no. 30 are denied, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/27/2018. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRIAN BURKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 3:16-cv-162-KRG-KAP
Memorandum Order
Post-dismissal motions filed by plaintiff in this matter
were referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with
the
Magistrates
Act,
28
U.S.C.§
636,
and
Local
Rule
72
for
Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
on June 14,
2017,
ECF no.
34,
Motion for Relief at ECF no.
recommending that the plaintiff's
26 be denied. The Magistrate Judge
filed a Report and Recommendation on June 9,
2017,
ECF no.
32,
recommending that the plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
at ECF no. 30 be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and
Recommendation on June 9, 2017, ECF no. 31, recommending that the
plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint,
styled Supplemental
Amended Complaint, at ECF no. 28 be denied.
The parties were given notice that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636(b) (1),
they had fourteen days to file written objections to
this Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed objections at ECF
no. 35, ECF no. 37, and ECF no. 38 that I have reviewed de novo and
reject.
After de novo review of the record of this matter, the
recommendations
of
the
Magistrate
Judge,
and
the
objections
thereto, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this
27f~y of
March 2018, it is
ORDERED that the plaintiff's motions at ECF no.
26, ECF
no. 28, and ECF no. 30 are denied.
BY THE COURT:
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:
Brian Burks HV-7243
S.C.I. Albion
10745 Route #18
Albion, PA 16475-0001
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?