ROADMAN v. SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL et al
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/1/2019. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA ROADMAN,
Case No. 3:16-cv-246
JUDGE KIM R. GIBSON
Plaintiff,
v.
SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL and
RONALD LEWIS,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I.
Introduction
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 63.) The
Motion is fully briefed (ECF Nos. 64, 66) and is ripe for disposition.
This case arises from Plaintiff Donna Roadman's ("Roadman") allegations that Defendant
Ronald Lewis ("Lewis") sexually harassed her at her workplace, Defendant Select Specialty
Hospital ("Select") (collectively, "Defendants"). See Roadman v. Select Specialty Hosp., Case No.
3:16-cv-246, 2018 WL 557922, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 23, 2018) (Gibson, J.); Roadman v. Select Specialty
Hosp., Case No. 3:16-cv-246, 2017 WL 4236581 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 2017) (Gibson, J.). Roadman
asks this Court to reconsider portions of its December 12, 2019 Memorandum Opinion and Order,
Roadman v. Select Specialty Hosp., Case No. 3:16-cv-246, 2018 WL 6524005 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2018),
denying Roadman's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 55). Because Roadman has failed to
meet the standard for reconsideration of an interlocutory order, Plaintiff's Motion for
Reconsideration (ECF No. 63) is DENIED.
1
II.
Factual Background 1
Defendant Select, a specialty hospital offering rehabilitative care and long-term acute care,
hired Roadman as a registered nurse to work at its Johnstown, Pennsylvania location on July 7,
2015. (ECF No. 30
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?