PENDLETON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motions at ECF no. 9 , ECF no. 10 , ECF no. 11 , and ECF no. 15 to alter or amend the judgment are denied. The appeal from the denial of the motion at ECF no. 12 for release on bail is denied; 13 Report and Recommendation and 16 Report and Recommendation are adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/29/2017. (dlg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Case No. 3:16-cv-258-KRG-KAP
Petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment at ECF
no. 9 and the supplements thereto at ECF no. 10, ECF no. 11, and
ECF no. 15, were referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for
proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636,
and Local Civil Rule 72.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
on May 18, 2017, ECF no. 13, and filed a Report and Recommendation
on June 22,
supplements thereto be denied.
recommending that the motion and
The parties were
notified at their
addresses of record that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1) they had
Petitioner filed objections,
and also filed an
appeal of the Magistrate Judge's order denying his motion at ECF
no. 12 for release on bail.
After de novo review of the record of this matter, the
following order is entered:
AND NOW, this
;?9 +h day
of September, 2017, it is
ORDERED that the petitioner's motions at ECF no. 9, ECF
no. 10, ECF no. 11, and ECF no. 15 to alter or amend the judgment
are denied. The appeal from the denial of the motion at ECF no.
12 for release on bail is denied. The Reports and Recommendations
are adopted as the opinion of the Court.
BY THE COURT:
KIM R. GIBSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:
Michael J. Pendleton DY-1646
1600 Walters Mill Road
Somerset, PA 15510
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?