TMTV, Corp. v. MASS Productions,Inc, et al

Filing 432

ORDER, granting 409 Motion to Set Aside Verdict, AMENDING Judgment based on the One Satisfaction Rule. Signed by Judge Raymond L. Acosta on 3/27/09. (ans)

1 2 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

TMTV, CORP.,
4 5 6

Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 00-1338 (RLA) v. MASS PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al.,

7

Defendants.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT BASED ON THE ONE SATISFACTION RULE

Defendants herein have moved the court to credit the settlement award paid by defendants in a separate copyright infringement

proceeding to the damages set by the jury in this case.1 We shall entertain defendants' request as a Rule 60(b)(5) Fed. R. Civ. P. petition which allows for relief in cases where "the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged". See, BUC Int'l

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Corp. v. Int'l Yatch Council Ltd., 517 F.3d 1271, 1274 (11th Cir. 2008); Torres-Troche v. Municipality of Yauco, 873 F.2d 499, 501 (1st Cir. 1989). Plaintiff instituted this action alleging copyright infringement based on defendants' unauthorized production of infringing derivative

It must be noted that a similar request was filed prior to trial which was denied by the court. See Defendants' Motion for Relief from Order Scheduling Trial on Damages (docket No. 289), Plaintiff's Response (docket No. 298) and Omnibus Order (docket No. 312). At that time plaintiff had yet to decide which type of damages it would pursue against defendants herein and no verdict assessing plaintiff's damages had been issued. Consequently, the court, at that point in time, was not in a position to grant the defendants' motion as more fully explained below.
1

1 2 3 4

CIVIL NO. 00-1338 (RLA)

Page 2

works which works were aired via television by the defendants named in TMTV, Corp. v. Pegasus Broadcasting of San Juan, Inc., Civ. No. 05-1621(JP).

5

The
6 7 8 9 10

one-satisfaction

rule,

which

provides

that

payments

previously made by

persons jointly liable shall be credited to the

sums due by judgment, has been found applicable to infringement suits brought under the Copyright Act. In BUC Int'l Corp., 517 F.3d at 1276 the court explained this principle by indicating that it "generally provides that a plaintiff is entitled to only one satisfaction for a single injury, such that amounts received in settlement from an

11

alleged tortfeasor are credited against judgments for the same injury
12 13 14 15 16

against non-settling tortfeasors." The underlying premise is "to prevent double recovery, or the overcompensation of a plaintiff for a single injury." Id. at 1277. It is beyond peradventure that the damages sought in Civ. No. 05-1621(JP) against the television station and related defendants arise from the same events charged in Civ. No. 00-1338(RLA). That is,

17

plaintiff seeks compensation from the illegal broadcasting of the
18 19 20 21 22

infringing

programs

which

is

also

the

subject

matter

of

the

proceedings currently before us. Even though plaintiff initially petitioned lost profits as well as actual damages in both proceedings, it opted to pursue only actual damages at the trial held in Civ. No. 1338(RLA) which the jury assessed at $772,079.29. Plaintiff has conceded that the actual

23

damages sought in both cases was the same. Further, in addressing
24 25 26

defendants' prior petition, plaintiff indicated that "[i]n the event plaintiff elects to be redressed in actual damages the amounts paid

1 2 3 4

CIVIL NO. 00-1338 (RLA)

Page 3

in settlement by Televicentro could be credited to the amount of damages found after trial hearing."2 Based on the foregoing, we find that defendants in this case are

5

entitled
6 7 8 9 10

to

a

reduction

in

the

$772,079.29

jury

award

by

the

$700,000.00 settlement sums received by plaintiff in Civ. No. 051621(JP) for claims arising from the same injury, i.e., actual damages resulting from the copyright infringement. Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Set Aside the Jury Verdict (docket No. 409)3 is GRANTED and the Judgment entered in this case (docket No. 408) shall be AMENDED to reduce plaintiff's outstanding

11

actual damages to $72,079.29.
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
2 Response in Opposition to Motion to Vacate Non Jury Trial (docket No. 289) p. 10 (emphasis ours).

IT IS SO ORDERED. San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 27th day of March, 2009.

S/Raymond L. Acosta RAYMOND L. ACOSTA United States District Judge

3

See Opposition (docket No. 412).