United States of America v. Rosario-Negron

Filing 8

ENFORCEMENT ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service to the Respondent be enforced. Abdiel Rosario-Negron shall appear before the designated Internal Revenue Service agent in accordance with their instructio ns and produce the documents and testimony called for in the summons no later than December 15, 2008. The United States of America shall recover its costs incurred in enforcing the Summons. (. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 10/1/08.)(mrj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER v. ABDIEL ROSARIO-NEGRON RESPONDENT ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT The Court held a hearing on this 1st day of October, 2008, the Respondent did not appear in person and, therefore, failed to show cause why he should not produce the required information. The Court further finds that based on the Revenue Officer's Declaration, the summons was issued pursuant to a legitimate purpose, to develop tax returns for years in which the taxpayer had not filed, summons was relevant to that purpose, information sought was not already within Service's possession, and appropriate CIVIL NO. 08-1796-JAF Petition to Enforce IRS Summons administrative steps had been followed. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service to the Respondent be enforced. Abdiel Rosario-Negrón shall appear before the designated Internal Revenue Service agent in accordance with their instructions and produce the documents and testimony called for in the summons no later than December 15, 2008, and it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States of America recover its costs incurred in enforcing the Summons. IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 1st day of October, 2008. S/JOSE A. FUSTE JOSE A. FUSTE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?