Abreu-Santana v. Administracion de Correccion et al

Filing 7

ORDER - The Court will enter judgment dismissing the 2 Complaint due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rule 10(b) and this Court's order entered at Docket No. 6. Signed by Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. on 10/31/2008. (mld)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO RAMÓN ABREU-SANTANA, Plaintiff v. CIVIL NO. 08-1873 (JP) ADMINISTRACIÓN DE CORRECCIÓN, et al., Defendants ORDER On August 7, 2008, Plaintiff Ramón Abreu-Santana ("Abreu") filed his complaint (No. 2), along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (No. 1). Spanish language. Plaintiff's complaint was filed in the Pursuant to Rule 10(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, all documents must be filed in the English language, or must be accompanied by a certified English translation. On September 8, 2008, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a certified translation of the complaint on or before October 8, 2008 (No. 6). The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in a dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. Manual notification of said Order was sent to Plaintiff on September 9, 2008. Plaintiff has failed to timely comply with the Court's Order to file a certified translation pursuant to Local Rule 10(b). In fact, more than three weeks have passed since the filing deadline, and CIVIL NO. 08-1873 (JP) -2- Plaintiff has neither filed the translation nor a motion for an extension of time to do so. The Court does not permit cases to Therefore, the Court will enter linger on its docket indefinitely. a separate judgment dismissing Plaintiff Abreu's complaint without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 31st day of October, 2008. s/Jaime Pieras, Jr. JAIME PIERAS, JR. U.S. SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?