Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. v. San Juan Cable LLC

Filing 37

OPINION AND ORDER: Remanding the case to the Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 8/22/2012.(TC)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2 3 4 FRANK GASCOT-NARVAEZ 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 Civil No. 10-1419 (GAG) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 9 OPINION AND ORDER 10 11 12 The instant case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for proceedings consistent with this order. 13 The Commissioner at page eleven of his memorandum concedes that the Administrative Law 14 Judge’s (“ALJ”) failure to find any severe impairment at Step II may have been an error. (See 15 Docket No. 19 at 11.) However, the Commissioner argues it was harmless. (See id.) 16 The court, upon review, cannot conclude that said error was indeed harmless or not. The 17 ALJ either missed or inadvertently ignored evidence that DDS psychologist Ramóm Nevares 18 determined that plaintiff had conditions tantamounting to a severe mental impairment. (See Tr. 371- 19 87); see also Memorandum of Commissioner at 11 n.4. This puts the court in a scenario opposite 20 to that in cases cited by the Commissioner (Docket No. 19 at 12-13), in which it was readily 21 determined that the error harmless. Here, we are not only looking at an ALJ who committed error 22 at Step II, but also one which now prevents the court from determining whether the error was 23 harmless or not because it appears that the ALJ in part did not consider all the evidence of record 24 before him. 25 26 27 28 Civil No. 10-1419 (GAG) 2 1 SO ORDERED. 2 In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 22nd day of August, 2012. 3 S/Gustavo A. Gelpí 4 GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?