Diaz-Rodriguez et al v. Figueroa-Sancha et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 29 MOTION TO DISMISS; granting 30 MOTION to Dismiss. Judgment shall follow accordingly. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 8/13/2013.(RJC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs CIVIL NO. 12-1243 (JAG) v. FIGUEROA-SANCHA, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, D.J. Pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss. (See Docket Nos. Plaintiffs’ 29 and claims 30). One against of those them seeks defendants dismissal named in of the complaint, but not yet served. (Docket No. 30). Since Plaintiffs failed to oppose this motion, they have waived any objection to the same. See Rodriguez–Salgado v. Somoza–Colombani, No. 11– 2159, 2013 WL 1403263, at *3 (D.P.R. Mar. 1, 2013) (quoting NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton, 283 F.3d 1, 7 (1st Cir. 2002)). Therefore, Plaintiffs’ claims against “Bill Fernandez, Sergeant Morales, Fernandez Company, Morales Company, Diaz‐Lebron Company” are hereby dismissed without prejudice. On provides the other sufficient hand, the material Court to finds sustain that the complaint the claims raised against the rest of the defendants in this case. Whether those CIVIL NO. 12-1243 (JAG) claims will survive a 2 properly supported motion for summary judgment is another matter. Therefore, Defendants’ other motion to dismiss (Docket No. 29) is hereby denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 13th day of August, 2013. s/Jay A. Garcia-Gregory JAY A. GARCIA-GREGORY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?