Tirado-Maldonado et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
19
ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for lack of proper service. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez-Gimenez on 9/30/2013. (VCC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Glorines Tirado-Maldonado;
Santos Maldonado-González and
Carmen Robles-Burgos
CIV. NO. 12-1673 (PG)
Plaintiffs
v.
United States of America; U.S.
Department of Justice, Drug
Enforcement Administration; ABC
Insurance Company.
Defendants
ORDER
The Complaint in the instant case was filed on August 16, 2012. On
November
9,
2012
defendants,
without
submitting
to
the
court’s
jurisdiction, moved to dismiss the Complaint for lack of proper service
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Docket No. 6. Defendants alleged that
the Attorney General of the United States had not been served with
process. Likewise, defendants asserted that neither the United States
Drug
Enforcement
Administration
(“DEA”)
nor
the
United
States
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) had been served.
Plaintiffs
responded
on
November
26,
2012.
Docket
No.
7.
In
essence, plaintiffs adduced that the summons directed to said parties
“couldn’t be found” and requested that the summons directed to the U.S.
Secretary of Justice and the DEA be reissued.
On December 16, 2012 plaintiffs filed a “Motion to Withdraw Urgent
Motion,” Docket No. 9, whereby they informed the Court that the original
summons for said defendants had been found and mailed through U.S.P.S.
Certified Mail to the parties within the 120 days provided by Fed. R.
Civ. P. 4(m). Hence, plaintiffs cured the initial deficiency in the
service of process.
For that reason, plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of proper
service is DENIED.
Civil No. 12-1673 (PG)
Page 2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
In San Juan, Puerto Rico, September 30, 2013.
s/ Juan M. Pérez-Giménez
JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?