Tirado-Maldonado et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 19

ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for lack of proper service. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez-Gimenez on 9/30/2013. (VCC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Glorines Tirado-Maldonado; Santos Maldonado-González and Carmen Robles-Burgos CIV. NO. 12-1673 (PG) Plaintiffs v. United States of America; U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration; ABC Insurance Company. Defendants ORDER The Complaint in the instant case was filed on August 16, 2012. On November 9, 2012 defendants, without submitting to the court’s jurisdiction, moved to dismiss the Complaint for lack of proper service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Docket No. 6. Defendants alleged that the Attorney General of the United States had not been served with process. Likewise, defendants asserted that neither the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) nor the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) had been served. Plaintiffs responded on November 26, 2012. Docket No. 7. In essence, plaintiffs adduced that the summons directed to said parties “couldn’t be found” and requested that the summons directed to the U.S. Secretary of Justice and the DEA be reissued. On December 16, 2012 plaintiffs filed a “Motion to Withdraw Urgent Motion,” Docket No. 9, whereby they informed the Court that the original summons for said defendants had been found and mailed through U.S.P.S. Certified Mail to the parties within the 120 days provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Hence, plaintiffs cured the initial deficiency in the service of process. For that reason, plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of proper service is DENIED. Civil No. 12-1673 (PG) Page 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, September 30, 2013. s/ Juan M. Pérez-Giménez JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?