Central Produce El Jibarito, Inc. v. PR Rexville Produce & Distributors, Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Service of TRO on Defendants due on or before 10/6/2012. Upon posting of bond, TRO will be in effect until 10/17/2012. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 10/3/2012. (RJC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
CENTRAL PRODUCE EL JIBARITO,
INC.
Plaintiff
CIVIL NO. 12-1816 (JAG)
v.
PR REXVILLE PRODUCE &
DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al.,
Defendants
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
On
October
2,
2012,
Plaintiff
filed
a
complaint
with
attachments, a motion for issuance of a temporary restraining
order, and for issuance of an order to show cause as to why a
preliminary injunction should not be issued, together with a
sworn
statement
in
support
thereof,
invoices
and
related
documents.
The Court has reviewed the allegations contained in the
complaint and the documents attached thereto, as well as the
motions.
Plaintiff,
a
seller
of
wholesale
quantities
of
perishable agricultural commodities, posits it sold a variety of
produce
to
Defendants
in
interstate
commerce.
This
sale
of
produce is governed by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities
Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499a-499e (“PACA”). PACA creates a statutory
trust
on
all
produce-related
assets
held
by
agricultural
merchants, dealers, and brokers, which must be maintained by the
buyer
pursuant
to
law
for
the
benefit
of
unpaid
suppliers,
Civ. No. 12-1816
sellers,
or
2
agents
who
provided
the
commodities
until
full
payment has been made by buyer.
Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and other supporting
documentation to prove that it is a produce dealer and creditor
of Defendants pursuant to the aforementioned Act, and that it
has not been paid for approximately $236,346.10 worth of produce
that
it
has
sold
to
Defendants.
The
documentation
supplied
further shows that Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff the full
amount due when payment was demanded.
Plaintiff’s counsel has also certified that if Plaintiff is
required to give notice to Defendants of the pendency of this
motion, trust assets may be further dissipated before the motion
is heard. (Docket No. 6). Thus, it is justified that a Temporary
Restraining Order for a period of fourteen (14) days be issued
by the Court to maintain the status quo and preserve the rights
of the parties until the Court has an opportunity to hear the
allegations of the parties.
Therefore, and pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion
for a Temporary Restraining Order, without hearing or notice,
for the next fourteen (14) days against defendants PR REXVILLE
PRODUCT & DISTRIBUTORS, INC., JORGE CABRERA, his wife JANE DOE,
and the Conjugal Partnership constituted between them, MELVIN
CABRERA,
his
constituted
wife
between
Jane
them.
Roe,
and
Defendants
the
Conjugal
are
ordered
Partnership
to
abstain
and/or refrain from dissipating, transferring and in any other
way liquidating any assets up to the amount in question due to
Plaintiff, which is $236,346.10.
The Court orders that all assets of Defendants, including
without limitation, bank accounts, and/or investment accounts of
Defendants
be
frozen
and
any
amounts
deposited
on
them
be
deposited with this Court. The Clerk of the Court shall issue
Civ. No. 12-1816
any
writs
necessary
3
in
order
to
enforce
this
order.
This
temporary restraining order shall be effective immediately upon
the posting by Plaintiff of a security bond in the amount of
$10,000.00. Plaintiff may satisfy this requirement by posting
with the clerk of the court cash or a bond obtained from a
professional bonding service.
The temporary restraining order herein issued will be in
effect until October 17, 2012. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to
deliver this order to Defendants in person on or before October
6, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 3rd day of October, 2012.
s/ Jay A. Garcia-Gregory
JAY A. GARCIA-GREGORY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?