Rodriguez-Tirado et al v. Speedy Bail Bonds et al
Filing
50
ORDER: ADOPTING 49 "Report and Recommendation" and accordingly, DENIES defendants motion to dismiss at Docket No. 40 . The parties shall submit, not later than March 16, 2016, a JOINT MOTION indicating (1) the anticipated length of trial; and (2) whether they consent to having this case tried before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 3/8/2016. (DJP)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ-TIRADO, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CIVIL NO. 13-1671 (PAD)
SPEEDY BAIL BONDS, et al.
Defendants
ORDER
On August 31, 2013, plaintiffs initiated this action against various defendants alleging
negligence under Puerto Rico law (Docket No. 1). On February 24, 2014, Chief Judge Aida M.
Delgado-Colón issued a Case Management Order setting August 31, 2014 as the discovery cutoff
date, and granting the parties until September 15, 2014 to move for summary judgment (Docket
No. 22). On June 3, 2014, the case was transferred to the undersigned’s docket (Docket No. 25).
On January 12, 2015, the discovery period was extended to April 30, 2015, and the motion for
summary judgment deadline extended to May 29, 2015 (Docket No. 35). On April 30, 2015, the
parties filed a joint motion for extension of time until August 1, 2015 to conclude discovery
(Docket No. 36), which was granted the following day (Docket No. 37). On July 31, 2015, the
parties filed another joint motion for extension of time, until October 1, 2015, to conclude
discovery (Docket No. 38). That request mas granted, and in doing so, the court forewarned the
parties that the case was over two years old such that no further requests for extensions would be
entertained (Docket No. 39).
On September 21, 2015, defendants moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for
plaintiffs’ alleged failure to prosecute this action (Docket No. 40). The motion was referred to
Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin (Docket No. 43), who, on February 17, 2016 issued a Report
Rodriguez-Tirado et al v. Speedy Bail Bonds et al
Civil No. 13-1671 (PAD)
Order
Page 2
and Recommendation, recommending that it be denied (Docket No. 49). The parties were granted
until March 7, 2016 to file objections. To date, no objection has been filed.
After conducting a de novo review of the motion at Docket No. 40, the opposition (Docket
No. 42), the “supplemental opposition” (Docket No. 45) as well as the Report and
Recommendation, the court determines that the magistrate judge’s findings are well supported in
the record and the law. With that in mind, the court ADOPTS in its entirety the magistrate judge’s
report for the reasons stated therein (Docket No. 49), and, accordingly, DENIES defendants’
motion to dismiss (Docket No. 40).
In light of this Order, the parties shall submit, not later than March 16, 2016, a JOINT
MOTION indicating (1) the anticipated length of trial; and (2) whether they consent to having this
case tried before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
SO ORDERED.
In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 8th day of March, 2016.
S/Pedro A. Delgado-Hernández
PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?