Marquez-Marin v. Lynch

Filing 230

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE, ARGUMENT, OR COMMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S IDENTIFICATIONS dismissing 173 Motion in Limine Signed by Judge John Woodcock, Jr on 8/11/2021. (tcs)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-01706-JAW-JCN Document 230 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO CARMEN MÁRQUEZ-MARÍN, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-01706-JAW ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE, ARGUMENT, OR COMMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S IDENTIFICATIONS On April 13, 2016, Carmen Márquez-Marín, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) at the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the District of Puerto Rico, filed a complaint against the United States Attorney General, alleging that the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) retaliated against her for her prior Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Act activity and created a hostile work environment, failed to provide her with reasonable accommodations for her disability, and discriminated against her due to her disability. 1 Compl. (ECF No. 1). On April 18, 2019, the DOJ moved for summary judgment, Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (ECF No. 92), which, on May 26, 2020, the Court denied in a two hundred twenty-four-page order, Order on Mot. for Summ. J. (ECF No. 155). On October 14, 2020, the Court held a pretrial conference, Min. Entry (ECF No. 175), and the next day, the Court The Court interchangeably refers to the Defendant as the Attorney General, the DOJ, and the USAO as the context requires. 1 Case 3:16-cv-01706-JAW-JCN Document 230 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 3 issued a final pretrial order, setting the deadlines for pretrial motions, Report of Final Pretrial Conference and Order (ECF No. 176). Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Court has not yet set a trial date. 2 In anticipation of trial, on October 13, 2020 the DOJ filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude evidence, argument, or comment regarding AUSA MárquezMarín’s proposed trial exhibits. Def.’s Mot. in Lim. to Exclude Evid., Argument, or Comment Regarding Pl.’s Identifications (ECF No. 173). The motion is a compilation of the DOJ’s objections to AUSA Márquez-Marín’s proposed trial exhibits. On November 9, 2020, AUSA Márquez-Marín responded in opposition. Pl.’s Opp’n to the Fifth Mot. in Lim. Presented by Def. (ECF No. 185). On November 16, 2020, the DOJ replied to AUSA Márquez-Marín’s response. Def.’s Reply to Pl.’s Resp. to Def.’s Mot. in Lim. to Exclude Evid., Argument, or Comment Regarding Pl.’s Identifications (ECF No. 196). The Court has reviewed the DOJ’s objections and finds two problems with the DOJ’s request to exclude AUSA Márquez-Marín’s proposed trial exhibits at this time. First, the parties have not provided the Court with many of the actual exhibits, and the Court cannot rule on exhibits that it has not seen. Second, the majority of the objections are based on relevancy and hearsay, while other objections are based on authenticity or lack of personal knowledge. The Court concludes that it is better to rule on the objections at trial, when the Court can consider the purpose and context The Court assumes familiarity with the factual background of this case, and thus recites only the relevant procedural history in this order. For an exhaustive account of the factual allegations, readers should refer to the Court’s summary judgment order. See Order on Mot. for Summ. J. at 4202 (ECF No. 155). 2 2 Case 3:16-cv-01706-JAW-JCN Document 230 Filed 08/11/21 Page 3 of 3 of the evidence. Therefore, the Court notes AUSA Márquez-Marín’s objections and will address them in an evidentiary context as they may arise at trial. IV. CONCLUSION The Court DISMISSES without prejudice the United States Attorney General’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence, Argument, or Comment Regarding Plaintiff’s Identifications (ECF No. 173). SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 11th day of August, 2021 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?